From WikiMentalHealth
The MoJ's decision to recall the claimant, although contrary to the RMO's advice, was not Wednesbury unreasonable or otherwise flawed on conventional public law grounds: the disagreement was not on medical grounds but on whether, given the history of arson and recent disengagement, a mere allegation of and arrest for arson was sufficient justification for recall.
External link
Bailii - No transcript on Bailii at time of writing
| This article is incomplete. You can help WikiMentalHealth by expanding it
|