R (N) v MHRT (2007) EWHC 1524 (Admin)
From WikiMentalHealth
The Tribunal must ask (1) is the patient suffering from psychopathic disorder (see s1(2))? If yes, (2) is that finding based solely on the fact of sexual deviancy (see s1(3))? Behaviour exhibited when exhibiting sexual deviancy may in part be basis for diagnosis. In this case, there were also separate symptoms. The decision not to adjourn was lawful
External links
This case summary is incomplete. You can help WikiMentalHealth by expanding it. Read the case transcript for details.
See Mental health caselaw for other cases. Cases on that page with bold links are the cases with more comprehensive summaries.
